ARTICLE 6: - SANDTA

BACK TO ALL ARTICLES

ARTICLE 6:

INTERVENTIONS IN SUBACUTE PAEDIATRIC INPATIENT NEUROREHABILITATION:

AN UMBRELLA REVIEW

AUTHOR: Robertson Et Al.

SOURCE: MJS Publishing (2025)

TAKE THE TEST BY SELECTING AND SUBMITTING YOUR ANSWERS BELOW

VIEW ARTICLE VIEW QUESTIONS

Step 2

Read the article and questions before you start the test

Step 3

Once you’ve finished reading the article select “start test”

Step 4

Complete the multiple choice test and submit your answers

Step 5

View your results instantly

2026 - Article 6: Interventions in Subacute Paediatric Inpatient Neurorehabilitation (Robertson et al., 2025)

The number of attempts remaining is 3

Please complete the following information to be sent to HPCSA.

1 / 15

What was the main objective of this umbrella review?

a) To develop new interventions for CP

b) To evaluate inpatient rehabilitation in adults

c) To summarize systematic reviews of inpatient paediatric neurorehabilitation during the subacute period

d) To compare inpatient vs outpatient care

e) To study only traumatic brain injuries

2 / 15

How many total papers were initially identified in the electronic search?

a) 447

b) 1,250

c) 1,462

d) 2,112

3 / 15

What was the main reason for exclusion of most studies?

a) Lack of full text

b) Interventions not within 6 months of injury or in outpatient settings

c) Wrong patient age group

d) Poor translation quality

4 / 15

Which tool was planned for assessing the quality of systematic reviews?

a) PRISM

b) AMSTAR 2

c) GRADE

d) CONSORT

5 / 15

Which tool was used to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews?

a) ROBINS-I

b) ROBIS

c) Cochrane RoB2

d) CASP

6 / 15

The ICF-Y framework emphasizes:

a) Only physical rehabilitation

b) Optimization of overall functioning and participation

c) Developing new pharmacological treatments

d) Adult rehabilitation

7 / 15

Children’s neurorehabilitation goals differ from adults because they focus on minimizing disruption to development.

a. True

b. False

8 / 15

What type of review was this study?

a) Narrative review

b) Scoping review

c) Umbrella review

d) Randomized controlled trial

9 / 15

The review timeframe included studies published since:

a) 1980

b) 1990

c) 2000

d) 2010

10 / 15

According to the article, what proportion of inpatient paediatric rehabilitation admissions in Australasia were neurological injuries?

a) 31%

b) 51%

c) 71%

d) 91%

11 / 15

What was one major limitation of this review?

a) Too few reviewers

b) Exclusion of outpatient and online interventions

c) Poor statistical analysis

d) No access to PubMed

12 / 15

The review noted that paediatric neurorehabilitation is a:

a) Low-complexity, high-volume field

b) High-complexity, low-volume field

c) High-volume, well-funded field

d) Low-complexity, high-evidence field

13 / 15

The authors identified international collaboration as essential for improving research and consistency.

a. True

b. False

14 / 15

What was one exclusion criterion related to patients’ medical status?

a) Exclusion of patients medically stable

b) Exclusion of patients in intensive care who were not yet stable

c) Exclusion of patients with mild conditions

d) Exclusion of patients under 10 years old

15 / 15

Which WHO framework was highlighted as valuable for structuring paediatric rehabilitation?

a) ICD-11

b) ICF-Y

c) DSM-5

d) WHODAS

Your score is

Exit